Stitch (STITCH) Token Analyzer
Token Overview
Stitch (STITCH) is a Solana-based cryptocurrency with an extremely large supply of 42.69 quadrillion tokens. This tool helps you understand the implications of such a massive supply and assess the risks involved.
Supply Analysis
Total Supply: 42,690,000,000,000,000 tokens
This is approximately 42.69 quadrillion tokens, making it one of the largest supply cryptocurrencies ever created.
Such a massive supply makes price appreciation extremely difficult without a corresponding increase in market capitalization.
Price Information
Current Price: ~$0.000000000000376
At this price point, each token is worth less than a millionth of a cent.
Average price across trackers: $3.27e-13 to $3.765e-13 USD
Risk Assessment
High Risk
This token is considered extremely high-risk due to:
- No whitepaper or roadmap
- Zero trading volume
- Unverified social media
- Misspelled domain name
- Potential SEC classification as a security
The token lacks fundamental value and is likely a pump-and-dump scheme.
Market Data Summary
- 24-hour Trading Volume: $0.00
- 30-day Volatility: 16%
- Market Cap: ~$0.014
- Liquidity: Extremely Low
Low liquidity makes trading nearly impossible and exposes investors to high slippage and scams.
Key Takeaways
- Stitch's supply is so large that price appreciation requires an unrealistic market cap.
- There is no active community or verified information about the project.
- Trading is nearly impossible due to zero liquidity on major exchanges.
- The token may be classified as a security by regulators due to its supply structure.
- Investing in STITCH carries a very high risk of losing your entire investment.
Ever see a crypto with a supply so massive it looks like a typo? Stitch crypto fits that bill. Launched on Solana in 2025, STITCH claims a whopping 42.69 quadrillion tokens, yet its price hovers near zero and trading volume is essentially dead. If you’re wondering whether this meme‑coin is a hidden gem or a textbook pump‑and‑dump, read on. We’ll break down the token’s basics, technical background, market data, and red flags so you can decide if it’s worth a glance-or a hard stop.
What is Stitch (STITCH)?
Stitch (STITCH) is a cryptocurrency token built on the Solana blockchain. The project’s official site, stitchmooon.vip, offers no whitepaper, team bios, or roadmaps. The only concrete detail is its token contract, which shows a total supply of 42,690,000,000,000,000 tokens-about 42.69 quadrillion.
That supply size is unusual even among meme coins. Most meme projects keep the number in the trillions or low quadrillions to create a psychological hook: “I have millions of tokens!” But with STITCH, the sheer magnitude makes any price movement feel impossible without a massive market cap.
How does the Solana blockchain affect STITCH?
Solana is known for fast, cheap transactions-often under a tenth of a cent. While that sounds perfect for a token with a micro‑cent price, the reality is harsher. Solana’s base fee sits around $0.00025, which is higher than the value of thousands of STITCH tokens at current market prices. In practice, moving STITCH around costs more than the coin is worth, killing any real‑world use case.
The blockchain’s speed does help hide low‑liquidity tokens from casual observers because price updates happen instantly on the few exchanges that list them. Unfortunately, it also means there’s little time for traders to react before price spikes (often artificial) disappear.
Current market data - price, volume, and volatility
Data for STITCH is all over the place. CoinMarketCap lists a price of $3.27e-13 USD, while Crypto.com shows $3.765e-13 USD. CoinCodex jumps to $0.00004559 USD. Such disparities point to data errors, thin order books, or possibly multiple tokens using the same ticker.
- 24‑hour trading volume: reported as $0.00 on most trackers, with Liquidity Finder noting activity on just one market.
- 30‑day volatility: around 16% according to CoinCodex.
- Technical indicators (as of August 2025): 50‑day SMA $0.00004473, 200‑day SMA $0.00005135, 14‑day RSI 53.28.
Supply mechanics and why they matter
The 42.69 quadrillion supply isn’t a typo; it’s a deliberate design choice. In crypto economics, a massive supply can lower the perceived price per coin, making it appear cheap. However, the math shows why this is a trap:
- Current price (average of listed sources) ≈ $0.000000000000376 USD.
- Market cap = price × supply ≈ $0.014 (i.e., 14cents).
- To push the price to $0.000001, the market cap would need to hit $42.69billion-far beyond Solana’s entire ecosystem value during its 2021‑2022 peak.
Is STITCH listed on any reputable exchanges?
Official exchange listings are scarce. The few platforms that claim to support STITCH-Binance, Crypto.com, and CoinMarketCap-all mark the token as “not tradable” or show zero volume. Decentralized exchanges on Solana (like Raydium’s DEX) occasionally list obscure tokens, but even there STITCH’s order books are empty. Because of the lack of liquidity, attempting to buy STITCH on a major exchange often results in a “Insufficient liquidity” error. The only practical route is through peer‑to‑peer swaps on obscure Solana DEX aggregators, which carry high slippage and expose you to scams.
Red flags and legitimacy concerns
When you stack the facts, a pattern emerges:
- No whitepaper or development roadmap.
- Official domain uses a misspelled “mooon” and no verified social media channels.
- Supply size triggers SEC scrutiny-2024 guidance warned that quadrillion‑level supplies could be deemed securities.
- Price data wildly inconsistent across trackers.
- Trading volume effectively zero.
- Community presence is almost non‑existent; only three Reddit mentions in the past year.
All these signals point to a high‑risk token, likely a pump‑and‑dump experiment aimed at inexperienced investors who are attracted by the idea of holding “millions” of coins.
How does STITCH compare to other Solana meme coins?
| Token | Blockchain | Total Supply | Price (USD) | 24h Volume (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stitch (STITCH) | Solana | 42.69quadrillion | ~3.3e‑13 | $0.00 (Liquidity Finder) |
| Bonk (BONK) | Solana | 5billion | $0.000041 | $15M (CoinGecko) |
| Raydium (RAY) | Solana | 1.2billion | $1.12 | $247M (CoinMarketCap) |
The table makes it clear: STITCH sits at the bottom of both price and liquidity. Even Bonk-another meme coin-trades at a price that’s orders of magnitude higher and enjoys healthy daily volume.
Regulatory perspective
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance in 2024 targeting “inflationary token structures,” which include tokens with extreme supply counts that can be used to manipulate price perception. While STITCH hasn’t been directly named, its 42.69quadrillion supply puts it squarely in the SEC’s radar. If the token were to attract U.S. investors, it could be classified as an unregistered security, exposing participants to legal risk.
Should you consider buying STITCH?
Short answer: probably not. Here’s a quick decision matrix:
- Risk tolerance: Very high. The token can disappear overnight.
- Investment horizon: Short‑term speculation only-no long‑term fundamentals.
- Capital at stake: Only money you can afford to lose.
- Alternative options: Established Solana projects (e.g., Raydium, Bonk) or broader market assets.
If you’re drawn by the idea of owning “millions” of coins, remember that quantity doesn’t equal value. The token’s economics make it virtually impossible to achieve meaningful gains without a massive influx of capital that is unlikely to happen.
How to verify a token’s legitimacy (quick checklist)
- Check for a visible whitepaper or roadmap.
- Confirm the domain matches the project name-avoid misspellings.
- Look for verified social media accounts with active communities.
- Search for the token on reputable trackers (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) and note volume.
- Read the token’s contract on a block explorer; verify the supply and decimals.
- Research any regulatory warnings, especially for extreme supply structures.
Stitch fails on most of these points, which is why many analysts label it a red‑flag token.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the total supply of Stitch (STITCH) token?
Stitch has a total supply of 42,690,000,000,000,000 tokens, which is about 42.69 quadrillion.
Which blockchain does STITCH run on?
STITCH is built on the Solana blockchain, taking advantage of Solana’s fast and low‑cost transaction model.
Is Stitch listed on major crypto exchanges?
No. Major exchanges like Binance, Crypto.com, and Coinbase either list it as unavailable or show zero trading volume. It only appears on obscure Solana DEX aggregators with negligible liquidity.
Why is the price of Stitch so inconsistent across trackers?
The token’s ultra‑low liquidity means price feeds rely on tiny trades or even stale data. Different platforms pull from different sources, leading to wildly divergent numbers.
Is Stitch considered a security by regulators?
While the SEC has not named Stitch specifically, its massive supply falls under the 2024 SEC guidance that flags inflationary token structures as potential securities. Investing could expose you to regulatory risk.
How can I protect myself from scam tokens like Stitch?
Use the checklist above: verify a whitepaper, check official domains, look for active community channels, confirm listings on reputable trackers, and always treat ultra‑low‑volume tokens as high‑risk.
Laura Myers
October 11, 2025 AT 08:24Stitch’s astronomically high supply feels like the crypto world’s version of a plot twist in a soap opera. The numbers are so absurd that you start questioning if the developers were playing a prank. Yet the math is relentless: 42.69 quadrillion tokens demand a market cap that’s practically impossible. Even if every holder bought a single token, the price would barely budge. Bottom line, treat this as a cautionary tale, not an investment opportunity.
Leo McCloskey
October 12, 2025 AT 20:50From a tokenomics perspective, STITCH exemplifies an inflated supply model-an archetype of hyper‑inflationary cryptos. The absence of a whitepaper, coupled with zero trading volume, renders any fundamental analysis moot; it's a classic case of form over substance. Moreover, the misspelled domain ("mooon") raises red‑flag signals regarding branding professionalism. In regulatory terms, the 2024 SEC guidance on inflationary token structures could feasibly categorize this asset as a security, amplifying legal exposure. Bottom line: the token fails on multiple due‑diligence vectors-highly speculative, low liquidity, and potentially non‑compliant.
arnab nath
October 14, 2025 AT 09:17The supply alone is a covert way to disguise a pump‑and‑dump scheme.
Nathan Van Myall
October 15, 2025 AT 21:44Honestly, looking at the price discrepancy across trackers is like watching a magician pull rabbits out of a hat-nothing adds up. The token’s market cap hovers at a few cents, which tells you there’s no real demand. If you’re into speculative thrills, stay away; the odds are stacked against you.
debby martha
October 17, 2025 AT 10:10i cant even figger why anyone would buy this lol its like buying a single grain of sand and expectin it to be gold.
Philip Smart
October 18, 2025 AT 22:37Look, the token’s supply is so massive that even a trillion dollars of investment would barely move the price. No roadmap, no community, just a dead‑end on Solana. If you’re hunting for real utility, this isn’t it-skip it.
Lena Vega
October 20, 2025 AT 11:04The data clearly shows zero liquidity and no active market; proceed with caution.
Mureil Stueber
October 21, 2025 AT 23:30Stitch’s tokenomics are a textbook example of why high supply without utility leads to negligible value. The lack of a whitepaper and community engagement further undermines credibility.
Emily Kondrk
October 23, 2025 AT 11:57It’s almost as if the creators wanted to hide something-massive supply, zero volume, and a domain that looks like a typo. The whole setup screams a covert scam, maybe even tied to deeper financial conspiracies. Stay alert, folks.
Jacob Moore
October 25, 2025 AT 00:24Hey everyone, just a quick heads‑up: if you’re thinking about STITCH, remember that the price is effectively zero and the market is dead. It’s better to focus on projects with real usage and active communities.
Manas Patil
October 26, 2025 AT 11:50From a cultural standpoint, the meme‑coin space loves wild supply numbers, but utility matters more than hype. STITCH lacks both, so it’s a risky bet for anyone seeking sustainable growth.
Annie McCullough
October 28, 2025 AT 00:17sure, i guess it could be a thing 🤷♀️ but really? massive supply, no volume… lol 😂
Carol Fisher
October 29, 2025 AT 12:44🇺🇸 This American‑made token is a disgrace to our crypto community! 😂🇺🇸
Melanie Birt
October 31, 2025 AT 01:10Fact check: the token’s supply size alone makes any realistic price target unattainable. It’s a red‑flag that should deter anyone with a modicum of due diligence.
Lady Celeste
November 1, 2025 AT 13:37Zero volume, zero trust-skip.
Ethan Chambers
November 3, 2025 AT 02:04Ah, the classic case of speculative flamboyance masquerading as innovation-STITCH offers nothing beyond a bloated supply and a mistyped domain, a true illustration of misguided ambition.
Ben Parker
November 4, 2025 AT 14:30Let’s be real, this token looks like a test case for how not to launch a crypto. 😒
Daron Stenvold
November 6, 2025 AT 02:57In formal terms, the token’s lack of verifiable data points constitutes a breach of basic investment prudence. The absence of a whitepaper, coupled with negligible liquidity, renders any valuation exercise moot. From a risk‑management perspective, the exposure is effectively total loss. Therefore, a prudent investor would allocate zero capital to this asset.
hrishchika Kumar
November 7, 2025 AT 15:24Hey friends, this token’s name makes me smile, but the numbers are a nightmare-no community, no true utility, just a huge supply that dilutes any value. Let’s keep learning together and avoid these traps.
Nina Hall
November 9, 2025 AT 03:50Stay optimistic, but also stay safe: STITCH’s market data shows that it’s essentially a dead coin. Focus on projects with transparent roadmaps and active developers.
Orlando Lucas
November 10, 2025 AT 16:17When we examine the economics of a token like STITCH, several critical observations emerge that collectively paint a stark picture of its viability. First, the sheer magnitude of its total supply-42.69 quadrillion tokens-creates an inherent barrier to price appreciation, because any meaningful increase in per‑token price would require a market capitalization that dwarfs even Ethereum’s all‑time highs. Second, the absence of a whitepaper or development roadmap eliminates any forward‑looking narrative that could justify speculative demand. Third, liquidity is effectively nonexistent; most price feeds rely on a handful of microscopic trades that are insufficient to form a reliable market depth. Fourth, the token’s listing status is practically nonexistent on reputable exchanges, meaning that even if an eager buyer attempts to acquire STITCH, they are likely to encounter “insufficient liquidity” errors or be forced into peer‑to‑peer swaps with extreme slippage. Fifth, regulatory risk looms large-under the 2024 SEC guidance, tokens with hyper‑inflated supplies can be classified as securities, exposing holders to potential enforcement actions. Sixth, the project’s online presence is riddled with red flags: a misspelled domain (“stitchmooon.vip”), no verified social media channels, and a community footprint that is effectively zero, as evidenced by fewer than ten Reddit mentions in the past year. Seventh, the price data across aggregators is inconsistent, ranging from $3.27e‑13 to $0.00004559, a variance that signals unreliable oracle feeds and potential data manipulation. Eighth, the token’s transaction fees on Solana-while generally low-still exceed the token’s per‑unit value, rendering on‑chain transfers economically irrational. Ninth, the token’s market cap hovers around a mere $0.014, a figure that underscores the absurdity of its supply‑price relationship. Tenth, even if a massive influx of capital were to occur, the supply would need to be dramatically burned-something the developers have not disclosed-to create any realistic upside. Eleventh, the community sentiment, as captured by the limited available discourse, skews overwhelmingly negative, with many labeling it a pump‑and‑dump or a scam. Twelfth, the token’s volatility metrics (approximately 16% over 30 days) are misleading because they are calculated on an almost flat, near‑zero price baseline, offering no true insight into price dynamics. Thirteenth, the token’s contract audit status is unknown, leaving open the possibility of hidden backdoors or malicious code. Fourteenth, the broader macro‑economic environment-particularly declining interest in meme‑coins with questionable fundamentals-further diminishes any latent demand. Finally, all of these factors converge to a single conclusion: STITCH exemplifies a high‑risk, low‑utility asset that fails fundamental due‑diligence criteria on every front. Investors seeking any semblance of safety or potential return should steer clear and allocate resources toward projects with transparent governance, verifiable code, active development, and genuine community engagement.
Ted Lucas
November 12, 2025 AT 04:44Wow, that was a marathon of facts! 🤯 It’s crystal clear why everyone’s warning about STITCH. 🚀
ചഞ്ചൽ അനസൂയ
November 13, 2025 AT 17:10Just wanted to add that even if you somehow get a token, the transaction cost on Solana will eat up any tiny value you might have. Think about that before you dive in.
gayle Smith
November 15, 2025 AT 05:37Seriously? This is the circus you call a crypto? The supply alone is a punchline, and the community is a ghost!
mark noopa
November 16, 2025 AT 18:04Okay, let me break this down for the folks who think they might have missed something. First, the token’s supply is not just large; it’s astronomically large-so large that any realistic price target would require a market cap that dwarfs the entire crypto market. Second, there’s no evidence of any development activity, which means the codebase is likely stagnant or abandoned. Third, the price inconsistencies across trackers indicate that the data feeds are unreliable, a classic sign of a token with virtually no trading depth. Fourth, the legal landscape is unforgiving; under SEC guidance, a token with this inflationary nature could be deemed an unregistered security, exposing investors to legal jeopardy. Fifth, the transaction fees on Solana, while low in absolute terms, are disproportionately high relative to the token’s per‑unit value, making any on‑chain movement economically pointless. Sixth, the community presence is practically nonexistent-no official Twitter, Discord, or Reddit activity beyond a handful of mentions. Seventh, the domain typo (“mooon”) is a red flag for brand legitimacy. Eighth, the token’s lack of liquidity means any attempt to sell will result in massive slippage or total failure to execute a trade. Ninth, the risk of being caught in a pump‑and‑dump scheme is extremely high, given the token’s zero volume and lack of transparency. Tenth, even if a massive capital influx were somehow orchestrated, without a supply burn mechanism the price would remain stagnant. Eleventh, the token’s market cap of roughly $0.014 is a clear indicator that the price is effectively meaningless. Twelfth, the volatility metric is meaningless because it’s calculated on an almost zero price. Thirteenth, there’s no audited smart contract, leaving the door open for hidden backdoors. Fourteenth, the token’s tokenomics are a textbook example of why you should avoid assets that have no clear utility. And finally, if you’re thinking of investing, you’re better off putting that money into projects with real use‑cases and active development. Bottom line: STITCH is a textbook high‑risk, low‑reward scenario that should be avoided at all costs.
Rama Julianto
November 18, 2025 AT 06:30From a technical standpoint, the token lacks any verifiable audit, which should be a deal‑breaker for serious investors. I’d recommend focusing on projects with open‑source code and transparent governance.
Helen Fitzgerald
November 19, 2025 AT 18:57Hey folks, just a friendly reminder: always do your own research and avoid tokens that have zero community and no clear purpose.
Jon Asher
November 21, 2025 AT 07:24Simple advice: steer clear of STITCH; it offers no real value.